in reply to Re: CGI::Prototype: questions and feedback
in thread CGI::Prototype: questions and feedback
The documentation I refer to most frequently is the definition of sub activate -- just to remind myself what happens, when.Yes, the code is meant to be small, directly understandable, and extensible. That's why it's a lot of small methods instead of one humungous subroutine.
That's not a cop-out for not providing better docs. My secret partner is feeding me examples and more tests, and I'm incorporating them in a new release probably in two weeks.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: CGI::Prototype: questions and feedback
by metaperl (Curate) on Jan 29, 2005 at 22:17 UTC |