It seems that XSLoader is easier to use than DynaLoader...
XSLoader is admittedly simpler(dumber), but that doesn't translate into easier to use (its not).
I doubt anyone who uses DynaLoader (in my experience the majority of users, very few use XSLoader)
actually had to write any code to use DynaLoader,
as h2xs
will do it for you.
I also doubt any of them ever read the DynaLoader documentation
and/or are aware of how "complicated" it is (its not).
...i would like to know what features XSLoader lacks, when compared to DynaLoader.
If you read the documentation for both modules, that is easily apparent.
| MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!" | | I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README). | | ** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy. |
| [reply] |
1. there are plans on p5p to join these
2. indeed, those functions do similar things, but dynaloader does more and has deeper searching logic.
3. XSLoader usually calls DynaLoader after bit preparing
Courage | [reply] |