Re^2: An Interesting Gotcha With use/require

That should not be a problem if your library declares a package name.

What do you mean by that? Note that File::Basename is a standard module whose first line reads:

    package File::Basename;
[download]

The problem isn't the library. The problem isn't the code either. The problem is the underlaying filesystem.

To the OP: "Here's a nickle kid. Get yourself a better computer"

Comment on Re^2: An Interesting Gotcha With use/require Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: An Interesting Gotcha With use/require by perrin (Chancellor) on Feb 09, 2005 at 15:56 UTC
Not File::Basename, but his library that uses it. There would not be any collision of imported names if that library was in a different namespace.	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Meditations