Re^3: Removing Single Quote Problem

What problems? I would also recommend reading perlstyle

next unless defined($item->{'title'}) && defined($item->{'link
+'}) && defined($item->{'description'});
[download]

could be written as

next unless defined $item->{title}
  and defined $item->{link}
  and defined $item->{description};
[download]

Also, why are you setting $output after trying to strip the singlequotes?

Ordinary morality is for ordinary people. -- A.C.

Comment on Re^3: Removing Single Quote Problem Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Removing Single Quote Problem by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Feb 10, 2005 at 22:01 UTC
I like `next if grep !defined, @$item{qw(title link description)};` [download] But it would be nice if the OP would do a better job of describing the problem(s). Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Removing Single Quote Problem by Anonymous Monk on Feb 10, 2005 at 21:36 UTC
How does your suggestion improve the code? Perlstyle doesn't say that we have to use "and" rather than "&&". I find "&&" more readable.	[reply]
Re^5: Removing Single Quote Problem by phaylon (Curate) on Feb 10, 2005 at 23:26 UTC
It doesn't. It is just more readable. The better one can read and understand your problem the better he can help. And that's why we're here, huh? :D Ordinary morality is for ordinary people. -- A.C.	[reply]
Re^6: Removing Single Quote Problem by Anonymous Monk on Feb 11, 2005 at 17:59 UTC
It is just more readable. No it's not. It just looks more like Pascal.	[reply]