in reply to Re^2: Taking advantage of multi-processor architecture
in thread Taking advantage of multi-processor architecture
That's really quite a silly thing - since it is an acronym after all . . .
You obviously didn't read the FAQ in question:
But never write "PERL", because perl is not an acronym, + apocryphal folklore and post-facto expansions notwithst +anding.
Besides, to paraphrase Data: One is the language's name, the other is not. If you're not going to be correct then you might as well call it "Throat-Warbler-Mangrove" (although one might tire of typing /usr/bin/Luxury-Yacht -e ... all the time).
Trek and Python (Monty) references; if only I could work in Tolkein for the hat trick . . .
Update: Bah, Corrected link to the TNG quotes page.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Taking advantage of multi-processor architecture
by melora (Scribe) on Feb 11, 2005 at 16:47 UTC | |
|
Re^4: Taking advantage of multi-processor architecture
by RazorbladeBidet (Friar) on Feb 11, 2005 at 16:53 UTC | |
by Fletch (Bishop) on Feb 11, 2005 at 17:12 UTC |