in reply to Fun with Numbers
You're mean. :-) So few people likely do that ... it's just plain mean.
I got it right on my first guess (you'll have to take my word for that ;-}), although I had to run it through the interpreter just to be sure. It's still mean.
As to why:the compiler ignores _ in numbers, but the string-to-number engine does not. |
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Fun with Numbers
by hardburn (Abbot) on Feb 11, 2005 at 21:46 UTC |