Re^2: Would you work at a porn company?

Bottom line: it's probably not good to automatically stigmatize someone based on their industry

My post doesn't stigmatize anyone.

It's easy to turn your nose up at the "porn" and yet how many of us have "prostituted" our intellect, abilities, time and values to 'fit in' elsewhere?

So what are you saying? That we should accept porn because we are all prostitutes?

Comment on Re^2: Would you work at a porn company?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Would you work at a porn company? by dimar (Curate) on Feb 14, 2005 at 06:34 UTC
My post doesn't stigmatize anyone. I noticed that. I was referring to the prospective employers of the world, those who might be reading this, those who might be inclined to devalue a prospective employee, not you or your post. So what are you saying? That we should accept porn because we are all prostitutes? Non sequitir. It was a rhetorical question. Let every man woman accept or reject whatever according to their own understanding and judgement. Whoever can say "my hands are totally clean" ... good for them.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Would you work at a porn company?
by dimar (Curate) on Feb 14, 2005 at 06:34 UTC

My post doesn't stigmatize anyone.

I noticed that. I was referring to the prospective employers of the world, those who might be reading this, those who might be inclined to devalue a prospective employee, not you or your post.

So what are you saying? That we should accept porn because we are all prostitutes?

Non sequitir. It was a rhetorical question. Let every man woman accept or reject whatever according to their own understanding and judgement. Whoever can say "my hands are totally clean" ... good for them.

[reply]