How hard do you think it would be to turn Pugs into a Perl6 compiler?
Do you think that with some Template Haskell trickery, you could use Pugs as a compiler with a minimal amount of extra work?
Would you like to see a Pugs compiler?
If there were a full-fledged Pugs compiler, would you like to see it support backends other than Parrot (i.e. C or LLVM or .Net)?
Would you be opposed to having Pugs become the perl6 compiler/interpreter?
Now that you've got some Perl6 experience under your belt, are there any features of Perl6 that you'd like to see added/changed/removed?
Will Pugs on Haskell make it easier for me to make a statically typed dialect of Perl6?
How long do you think it will be before someone writes a Haskell interpreter in Perl6 (which runs under Pugs ;-)
Are there any plans to add optimizations to Pugs to make interpreted programs run fast (or is the main goal just a working, if not speedy, implementation)?
Has the work so far been easier, or harder than you initially thought.
What do you think of Parsec (compared to other parser generators)?
Do you wish that people who complain about your good work would have enough sense to just keep their mouths shut?
-- All code is 100% tested and functional unless otherwise noted.