Here is my second attempt at a JAPH. I took a different approach then my first try. Tell me what you think. Might not be the best, but Im proud!

{$_ .= <DATA>;redo if !eof(DATA); }s/#//g;eval __END__ ########map######$a.=#######chr($##_), qw/112 114 105 ##110 ##116## 32 34 ## ## ## ######## ##### 74 ####### 117 ## 115 116 ##32 97 110## 111 116## 104## 101## 114 32 80 101 114 108 32 ##104 97 99###### 107## 101## 114####### 44 34 59/;eval $a

Hey look mom, I can code in perl!

zzSPECTREz

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: JAPH 2nd try
by clash (Novice) on Nov 28, 2000 at 01:17 UTC
    Very nice. It seems that nowadays this is the thing for obfusated code. I don't obfuscate my code -- yet :-). If all you monks looking at this like it, then check out just another japh. Thats all bye
Re: JAPH 2nd try
by Rydor (Scribe) on Nov 28, 2000 at 21:02 UTC
    Not bad, but a bit simple. All it is is a very used translation from ord to chr hidden in a bunch of '#'s. Perhaps obfuscate the code hidden in the 'PERL' to make it a bit more confusing.

    @:::::::((==========Rydor====>