Re^2: Seemingly enigmatic data structures

in reply to Re: Seemingly enigmatic data structures
in thread Seemingly enigmatic data structures

must be used in one place
must not be used in one place

isn't this a contradiction?

UPDATE: Ah, OK, I get it now, more or less. Though I do think that could have been more clearly worded.

"...first data structure level of a reference" is pretty gibberishy to me. But the examples make it more or less clear.

Comment on Re^2: Seemingly enigmatic data structures

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Seemingly enigmatic data structures by merlyn (Sage) on Mar 05, 2005 at 13:55 UTC
Another simpler rule is: Arrows are optional between subscripty kinds of things (brackets, braces, parens). -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.	[reply]
Re^4: Seemingly enigmatic data structures by tphyahoo (Vicar) on Mar 05, 2005 at 17:39 UTC
Thinking "between" helps. But wouldn't that just be brackets and braces? Where are arrows optional between parens?	[reply]
Re^5: Seemingly enigmatic data structures by Joost (Canon) on Mar 05, 2005 at 18:01 UTC
In cases like this: `#!perl -w use strict; my $a = sub { sub { "thingy" } }; print $a->()();` [download] "What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"	[reply] [d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom