in reply to Re: rand and srand across builds and platforms?
in thread rand and srand across builds and platforms?

However I think Math::Random is more consistent.

I think my favorite Math::Random::MT might be also, but it would be too much to add a prerequisite for a compiled package that's only used in testing I think.

I can embed a few useful sequences I guess.


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
Silence betokens consent.
Love the truth but pardon error.
  • Comment on Re^2: rand and srand across builds and platforms?