in reply to Re^2: Trying to understand how CGI::Prototype::Hidden, Template Toolkit and CGI.pm work together.
in thread Trying to understand how CGI::Prototype::Hidden, Template Toolkit and CGI.pm work together.

Since CGI.end_form really just spits out a single closed form tag, why not replace it with a literal </form>? This is what i have been doing when i use the CGI TT plugin.

UPDATE: I really have no idea why. I am sure someone had good intentions ... but somehow painted themselves in a corner. Hind sight is 20/20 ... and from my recent work experience i have learned that some things can't be easily fixed.

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
  • Comment on Re^3: Trying to understand how CGI::Prototype::Hidden, Template Toolkit and CGI.pm work together.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Trying to understand how CGI::Prototype::Hidden, Template Toolkit and CGI.pm work together.
by rlb3 (Deacon) on Mar 09, 2005 at 20:42 UTC

    Thanks for the info. Just out of curiosity, do you know why end_form was written the way it was?