I'd agree on using an HTTP redirect, but not necessarily a 302: Note: RFC 1945 and RFC 2068 specify that the client is not allowed
to change the method on the redirected request. However, most
existing user agent implementations treat 302 as if it were a 303
response, performing a GET on the Location field-value regardless
of the original request method. The status codes 303 and 307 have
been added for servers that wish to make unambiguously clear which
kind of reaction is expected of the client You'd want to use a 303 if the browser supports HTTP/1.1, 302 of they support HTTP/1.0, and no status, just the Location: header if it's pre-HTTP/1.0. You may have to change the logic of your program to deal with GET to the rewritten URL differently from a POST to it, to deal with someone being sent there the first time, vs. coming back to it later for an update.
| [reply] |