Re^2: Space Efficiency of Hashes

in reply to Re: Space Efficiency of Hashes
in thread Space Efficiency of Hashes

Thanks (and to Joost as well): this indicates that I'll max out under 2 GB of RAM, leaving plenty free for other stuff running. I didn't think of just going ahead and testing overhead like that, but it seems a really obvious way to approach it in retrospect! Thanks for the enlightenment.

Comment on Re^2: Space Efficiency of Hashes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Space Efficiency of Hashes by nsome (Novice) on Mar 16, 2005 at 14:30 UTC
You can also use Tie::SubsrHash and max memory required for you program will be around 300 MB.	[reply]
Re^4: Space Efficiency of Hashes by dpavlin (Friar) on Mar 16, 2005 at 23:25 UTC
Nice approach. Fixed-sized records would never come to my mind. Correct name is Tie::SubstrHash. 2share!2flame...	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom