For a source of appropriate code, I suggest wandering
through Snippets, Code, and Craft then asking the
appropriate monk.
Also I noticed that you haven't been using strict in the
series yet. Tsk, tsk. :-) | [reply] |
Overrated?
Here is my rating of strict. It catches about 90% of my
typos. As you say, plan for failure, not for success. I
hope to catch all of my typos. I work at it. But I am not
going to plan on success, and I am not going to throw away
any tool that helps me achieve this success.
For this reason and this reason alone, strict is utterly
invaluable to me. I don't know about others but I don't
expect it to catch syntax errors. Logic errors are out of
its purview. I wasn't planning on using symbolic references
anyways, it is kind of nice to have it catch accidents where
I pass the wrong thing to a function that expects to get a
reference though. In short, it doesn't solve any deep
problems.
But it still catches a lot of typos for me...
| [reply] |
And under-used.
--
Zigster
| [reply] |
Dominus would you care to explain why?
| [reply] |