Re: The way I met this (already not) new 2005 year

I was wondering if there is any reason (apart from personal taste or lazyness, which I value most :) for using:

my $nyear = (split '\s', localtime)[4]+1;
[download]

instead of

my $nyear = (localtime)[5] + 1;
[download]

for getting the year. Notwithstanding, it had a positive effect: it made me learn that localtime can be meaningfully invoked in scalar context too.

Flavio

-- Don't fool yourself.

Comment on Re: The way I met this (already not) new 2005 year Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: The way I met this (already not) new 2005 year by sh1tn (Priest) on Mar 20, 2005 at 18:40 UTC
or (maybe): `... (my$nyear = localtime) =~ s/.+?(\w+)$/$1+1/eo;#:) ...` [download]	[reply] [d/l]