in reply to RFC: CGI program - any security holes?
I feel your pain and all, but that's a lot of code for a busy monk to read, especially if the monk is in search of possible security holes. You need to figure out which are "the naughty bits" and discuss those. (Provide the rest of the code for context, maybe as a <readmore> addendum, if you wish.)
Good luck.
the lowliest monk
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: RFC: CGI program - any security holes?
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 21, 2005 at 16:35 UTC |