Re^5: A Lost Monk's Rogation

I am a member of SDC, so I just assumed it worked as it did back in the day when I last edited the old FAQ section (probably 2 or 3 years ago). That is, I expected nodes I could edit to look like a regular editable node.

Thanks for the updated information. For what it's worth, I don't even have the SiteDocClan nodelet turned on, nor have I ever heard that there *is* a wiki for SDC, that's how long it's been.

Comment on Re^5: A Lost Monk's Rogation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: A Lost Monk's Rogation by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 21, 2005 at 09:07 UTC
Well, just to explain a little: the nodes you are thinking of are sitefaqlets which you can edit directly. However there was a need to provide a way for SDC to be able to update the text that would be displayed in superdocs so the sitedoclet was invented for that purpose. Basically its a special type of template that PMDEV can set up for superdocs so that SDC can manage the text without require patches to be applied. Since the FAQ for the RAT needs to be able to output HTML that would normally be scrubbed it has to be a superdoc, but I wanted SDC to be able to edit it so the main content is in a sitedoclet. Anyway, welcome back. :-) --- demerphq	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: A Lost Monk's Rogation
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 21, 2005 at 09:07 UTC

Well, just to explain a little: the nodes you are thinking of are sitefaqlets which you can edit directly. However there was a need to provide a way for SDC to be able to update the text that would be displayed in superdocs so the sitedoclet was invented for that purpose. Basically its a special type of template that PMDEV can set up for superdocs so that SDC can manage the text without require patches to be applied. Since the FAQ for the RAT needs to be able to output HTML that would normally be scrubbed it has to be a superdoc, but I wanted SDC to be able to edit it so the main content is in a sitedoclet.

Anyway, welcome back. :-)

---
demerphq

[reply]