in reply to Re^8: Calling a sub from a variable ?
in thread Calling a sub from a variable ?

That depends on a bazillion factors, a few of which are: In other words, the benchmark can vary even by time of day or day of the week or even day of the year. (If you have a bunch of quarterly reports that are run, that can affect your database load which affects your OS caching performance which affect your ... you get the picture.)

Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Calling a sub from a variable ?
by ZlR (Chaplain) on Mar 22, 2005 at 15:38 UTC
    I agree with that.

    This server is a Solaris 5.8 server with a hudge free list (3 638 832 K right now and it stays over 1 Gb at program runtime) .

    I believe the FS cache has not been tuned although i know more of this with AIX. Anyhow there is plenty of free pages to cache the data and thus descarding IO in that special case. As you say, it could have been different .