Re^3: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok.

sub start_parser {
    my @resp = ();
    if (!param()){ 
    push @resp, &Modules::Htmlpage::make_header("Hello first page.");
    push @resp, &Modules::Htmlpage::make_first_page();
    } elsif (param('get_in')){
    push @resp, &Modules::Htmlpage::make_header("I say hello to you.")
+;
    push @resp, &Modules::Htmlpage::make_top_content("home");

    }
    push @resp, end_html;   
    return @resp;
}
[download]

If param() is true (i.e. there are parameters in the HTTP request) and param('get_in') is false (i.e. there isn't a get_in parameter or is was '' or '0') then start_parser() will just return '</body></html>'.

Fix it so that it returns an appropriate valid CGI response under these circumstances.

BTW: Do you know what the special &-prefixed subroutine call syntax does? If not then don't use it. If so, why you think you need it?

Update: Fixed spurious ! typo.

Comment on Re^3: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok. Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok. by ambs (Pilgrim) on Mar 27, 2005 at 18:08 UTC
Just to help the newbies, when you call a function just with `&foo` the values in `@_` are used as arguments to the function. This leads to some weird results. So, when you just want to call a function, use `foo()`. Alberto Simões	[reply]
Re^5: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok. by Fletch (Bishop) on Mar 27, 2005 at 22:49 UTC
Erm, yes and no. `&foo;` (with no parens) passes the caller's `@_`, whereas `&foo();` (with empty parens) passes an empty argument list. The former also has the side-effect of ignoring any prototypes. See `perldoc perlsub` for more details.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok. by Pescador (Novice) on Mar 27, 2005 at 18:26 UTC
Thanks for helping this newbie :)	[reply]
Re^4: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok. by Pescador (Novice) on Mar 27, 2005 at 17:46 UTC
!param() is true (i.e. there -> aren't <- parameters in the HTTP request). Maybe i should read better ;) &-prefixed subroutines...	[reply]
Re^5: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok. by nobull (Friar) on Mar 27, 2005 at 21:23 UTC
!param() is true (i.e. there -> aren't <- parameters in the HTTP request). Er, no I should have said one of: param() is true (i.e. there are parameters in the HTTP request). !param() is false (i.e. there are parameters in the HTTP request). Previous post now corrected	[reply]
Re^4: Problem with internet explorer.Mozilla firefox,beonex,netscape ok. by Pescador (Novice) on Mar 27, 2005 at 18:03 UTC
!param() is true (i.e. there aren't parameters in the HTTP request) About &-prefixed .. it seems that a should read better ... :(	[reply]