in reply to download JPG series with error-handling
Update: I wouldn't put money on the server sending back a 404 for a missing image, although any half-decent webmaster will do this (in addition to possibly supplying an error document), but I think you could rely on it for most applications. If you find this is not the case, I would think testing the mime type of the returned document would be more efficient than a HEAD request potentially followed by a GET.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: download JPG series with error-handling
by BrentDax (Hermit) on Mar 28, 2005 at 04:26 UTC | |
by DrWhy (Chaplain) on Mar 28, 2005 at 05:33 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 28, 2005 at 06:09 UTC | |
|
Re^2: download JPG series with error-handling
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 28, 2005 at 08:52 UTC |