in reply to Re^3: Interview Prepration
in thread Interview Prepration

Right. They're syntax aliases, but they're semantically entirely different things. Did you read what I quoted? It explains what I mean, and I don't want to keep retyping that.

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Interview Prepration
by Tanktalus (Canon) on Apr 04, 2005 at 17:45 UTC

    To quote:

    They're definitely two different kinds of loops. However the text for and foreach may be used to introduce either one. The actual loop-style is determined by what follows.
    Which, seems to me, answers the question:
    What is the difference between for & foreach, exec & system
    as "for & foreach are aliases - there is no difference. They both introduce either a for-style loop or a foreach-style loop, determined by what follows."

    Methinks you're getting a bit bent out of shape over someone agreeing with you. Either that, or I'm completely missing your point.

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]
      It's a language (English) problem - for and foreach are words but they also designate the style of the loop, which I think is what merlyn is getting at.

      The words are aliases, the loops are not, as they are taken in context. It sounded like the disagreement was over:
      for & foreach are now an alias to each other
      which is ambiguous
      --------------
      "But what of all those sweet words you spoke in private?"
      "Oh that's just what we call pillow talk, baby, that's all."
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom