in reply to How to use a variable in tr///

Is there some reason that you don't want to use s///g instead of tr///g?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: How to use a variable in tr///
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Apr 08, 2005 at 11:30 UTC
    There is no transliteration built into s///g. The OP's example was tr/abc/def/. s/// can't do that without some help (some kind of lookup structure, or embedding a tr command in the eval'd replacement, and in that case, why not just eval?).
    Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.
[reply]
      why not just eval?
      Because with eval, you must worry about delimiters. For example, if either string had contained "/", the eval example given elsewhere in this thread would fail. Also, eval invites disaster in a proxy-privilege environment (like CGI or other daemons).

      The lookup table isn't hard to create: 

      ## initialization
my $old = 'abc';
my $new = 'xyz';
my %table; @table{split //, $old} = split //, $new;
my $table_re = join '|', map quotemeta reverse sort keys %table;

## the deed
my $string = 'abracadabra';
$string =~ s/($table_re)/$table{$1}/g;

      [download]

      -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
      Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.

[reply]
[d/l]
        The "why not just eval?" referred to the case of embedding an eval'd tr/// in an s///e, which would be no better. But your cautions are valid. [Update: and addressed here]

        Update:
        Though for character replacement, I'd build the regex using a character class rather than alternation: 

        my $table_re = sprintf '[%s]', join '', map quotemeta, keys %table;

        [download]
        Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.
[reply]
[d/l]
      Umm... right you are... Silly me :). Usually i just try to stay away from eval as it can be nasty sometimes.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom