Re: using HTML::Element with an attribute name without value

According to the HTML specs, <tag att> is equivalent to <tag att="att">. Also XHTML mandates lower-case tags (which incidentally, are easier to type). I guess you should go for ['img', { ismap => 'ismap' }] just to be on the safe side.

update: just FYI: XHTML doesn't allow attributes without values, so in XHTML you need to do att="att".

"What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"

Comment on Re: using HTML::Element with an attribute name without value Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: using HTML::Element with an attribute name without value by telcontar (Beadle) on Apr 09, 2005 at 16:09 UTC
I didn't know that `<tag att>` was equivalent to `<tag att="att">`... That answers my question :-) Thank you. John	[reply] [d/l] [select]