in reply to Re^2: Is Haskell always going to be needed for Perl6 compilation?
in thread Is Haskell always going to be needed for Perl6 compilation?
Inertia and momentum - at least currently, Pugs-on-Haskell has all the momentum, and Perl 6 development has shown a lot of inertia. Of course, maybe some time somebody starts a topaz-like effort to implement Perl6 in itself; and this time, it's much more likely to succeed, as Perl6 has enough power to become self-sustaining (unlike Perl5), and can maybe even have a straight first machine-generated translation from Haskell. But I don't see that this will inevitably succeed, while I see the success of Pugs/Haskell immediately.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Is Haskell always going to be needed for Perl6 compilation?
by merlyn (Sage) on Apr 10, 2005 at 16:44 UTC | |
by Corion (Patriarch) on Apr 10, 2005 at 17:52 UTC |