in reply to Re: setup of a small perl game
in thread setup of a small perl game

Thanks for your help! I tried using your method and got the following. It sorta works as it either says you got it right or wrong. However I don't know how to make it go back to the beginning if they got it right. It just sort of sits there until you make 4 more wrong guesses after you make it right.

What do I need to do?

while (1)
{
   
   ###########
   # Heart of the game- Choose and scramble a word
   ###########
   my $word = $words[rand @words];

   my @scramble = split(//, $word);

   @scramble = sort { (-1,1)[rand 2] } @scramble;

   print "\n\nGuess the scrambled word: ";
   foreach (@scramble) {print $_};
   print "\n\n";


   my $attempts = 0;

   while ($attempts++ < $max_attempts)
   {

      #####
      # Take their guess
      #####
      my $guess = <STDIN>;
      chomp($guess);

      if ($guess ne "$word")
      {
         print "$guess is incorrect.\n";
         $attempts++;
      }
      else
      {
        print "Congratulations!  The scrambled word was $word.\n\n";
      }
   }
   
}

[download]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: setup of a small perl game
by tlm (Prior) on Apr 12, 2005 at 03:53 UTC

    The quick fix would be to insert a last after the "Congratulations" line, like this: 

      {
    print "Congratulations!  The scrambled word was $word.\n\n";
    last;
  }

    [download]
    but IMHO I would advice you to follow the structure I gave you more closely; I think you will find that your script is clearer, and more easily modified and debugged if you actually implement functions like check_answer(), etc., that I used in the "wishfulthinking code". The more your code looks like pseudocode, the clearer it will be.

    the lowliest monk

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]
      last; did fix it, thanks!

      You are probably right, functions might be easier to debug later. By functions do you mean sub routines? I could probably do that. I'm not too versed with self-made functions, however.

[reply]

        Yes, subroutines. Subs are one of the most powerful ways to tame code complexity; without them you quickly end up with huge, monolithic scripts that are impossible to read, modify, or debug. Read perlsub, and soon you'll be sub genius. :-)

        the lowliest monk

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom