in reply to Re: Better with warnings
in thread Better with warnings

cristian,
It is not mandatory for the code posted in this section to be a JAPH. It often is, but some of the most interesting things here were completely different.

Check out:
Erudil's camel code and eyepopslikeamosquito's Saturn if you haven't already.

All that's required is that the methodology of the script is not imeddiatly apparent to all. In short - simply obfuscated code.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Better with warnings
by cristian (Hermit) on Apr 12, 2005 at 19:25 UTC
    Yes understand. I not criticize the code , only questions the finaly the obfuscade code not search to outwit with Japh. For what outwit japh and where is the concept? My end not is to offend , is learn. Thanks ktros and deibyz for learn.