Re: SOAP::Lite - worst SOAP implementation?

Hang on there. The Java RMI being measured there is not SOAP. It's just there to show you how much SOAP sucks compared to basically any of the other remote method protocols that have been around for years.

Now, granted, SOAP::Lite is still twice as slow as the SOAP RMI in Java, but that's practically line-noise when you consider how monumentally slow SOAP is at doing much of anything.

Comment on Re: SOAP::Lite - worst SOAP implementation?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: SOAP::Lite - worst SOAP implementation? by cLive ;-) (Prior) on Apr 12, 2005 at 19:13 UTC
"The Java RMI being measured there is not SOAP." /me goes back to actually read the article in detail :) The Apache Axis server is more than twice as fast as SOAP::Lite - especially on some of the larger tests (from what I can see in my second quick read-through. Hmmmmm, headache time. I must be turning into management. I glaze over on the details a lot quicker these days ;-) cLive ;-)	[reply]
Re^3: SOAP::Lite - worst SOAP implementation? by bluto (Curate) on Apr 12, 2005 at 20:50 UTC
I must be turning into management. I glaze over on the details a lot quicker these days ;-) No, you are not management. The difference between management and just growing older is that management wouldn't bother to re-read the article. :-)	[reply]