Re^3: Structural Elegance

But if you give it a fancy name, "Singleton", then the global is acceptable...to some.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco.

Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?

Comment on Re^3: Structural Elegance Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Structural Elegance by TimToady (Parson) on Apr 20, 2005 at 22:18 UTC
And if you call it a "monad", a different group of people gets excited. But wait, monads are threaded through, which makes them tramp data instead, I guess... `:-)`	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Structural Elegance by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 20, 2005 at 22:27 UTC
:) Maybe you could re-term "side-effects" as "concurrent behaviours" and start a whole new fad for another old idea? If you do it, it just might work! Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?	[reply]
Re^6: Structural Elegance by Ovid (Cardinal) on Apr 20, 2005 at 23:31 UTC
This is beautiful. Too bad so few of my friends would understand why it's funny. Cheers, Ovid New address of my CGI Course.	[reply]
Re^7: Structural Elegance by apotheon (Deacon) on May 02, 2005 at 08:14 UTC
Re^7: Structural Elegance by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 21, 2005 at 00:24 UTC