in reply to Re: Pass By Reference Inner Workings - Magic scalar operator
in thread Pass By Reference Inner Workings - Magic scalar operator
davido, I'm surprised and ashamed for you. You should have told him about shift() before or instead of +shift. The former looks normal and has identical functionality while the latter is just an abuse of unary +.
... = %{shift()}
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Pass By Reference Inner Workings - Magic scalar operator
by davido (Cardinal) on May 01, 2005 at 08:12 UTC |