Re: RFC: Junction.pm

What does this do that Quantum::Superpositions doesn't? (I know it's a lot of good syntactic sugar, but you need to elaborate on that in the POD.)

The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good.

Comment on Re: RFC: Junction.pm

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Junction.pm by hardburn (Abbot) on May 02, 2005 at 13:47 UTC
I would imagine a simple operator overloading class would be far less of a beast than Q::S. "There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.	[reply]
Re^2: RFC: Junction.pm by itub (Priest) on May 02, 2005 at 15:20 UTC
What does this do that Quantum::Superpositions doesn't? Have a reasonable name (sorry, Damian).	[reply]
Re^2: RFC: Junction.pm by fireartist (Chaplain) on May 02, 2005 at 13:53 UTC
Thanks, I'll have to spend a while longer looking through the docs to figure out if it does what I want. I had searched cpan for 'junction', and got no results. Silly me, I should have known to search for Quantum Superpositions!	[reply]