in reply to Insert the 4th TCP packet after TCP three-times handshakes
I'm provisionally with merlyn on this. While the code may be an interesting example of how to do TCP/IP, please give us some discussion on that subject. All we have here is a code listing and an output dump.
Yes, the code is interesting, in the sense that all non-trivial code is interesting, but as mentioned, it also has the whiff of potential naughtiness. Without some other information to give this node/thread more oomph, I don't see how the monastery would be harmed by having the Powers That Be say, "thank you, that was very nice, and now we're making it go away."
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Insert the 4th TCP packet after TCP three-times handshakes
by jacques (Priest) on May 04, 2005 at 04:26 UTC | |
by mstone (Deacon) on May 05, 2005 at 01:16 UTC | |
|
Re^2: Insert the 4th TCP packet after TCP three-times handshakes
by shanleiguang (Initiate) on May 08, 2005 at 02:59 UTC | |
by merlyn (Sage) on May 08, 2005 at 04:04 UTC |