in reply to Suggestion for module namespace assignment

I like the notion of Engineering:: (as discussed in the CB), however the existing Telephony:: namespace may be more appropriate.

To extend the OP, what is involved in the creation of a new top-level namespace? The potential offerings for Engineering:: (at least those I'm aware of) are sparse currently:

I may have omitted a few modules (CPAN searches return hundreds of "engine" modules; google didn't differentiate between engineering and "software engineering"), but I'd like to see the collection grow and become substantive.

UPDATE: For clarification, during the previous conversation in the CB, a significant portion was devoted to exploring the viability of the Engineering:: namespace, specifically Engineering::Telephony::ErlangB.

  • Comment on Re: Suggestion for module namespace assignment