Re^6: Perl 6 links (//)

That's only part of the issue, but no.

If you'd done a super search before asking, you would have proposed [^ :] instead, but would have still found *tons* of nodes.

Comment on Re^6: Perl 6 links (//) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Perl 6 links (//) by ysth (Canon) on May 15, 2005 at 15:45 UTC
Ah, yes; `[^ :]` indeed. I found (based on current handlelinks setting): https://script not found on port 443 http://www.url.com/cgi-bin/file.pl?node=how http://www.cpan.org http://use.perl.org/perldelta.html HTTP:Daemon : Address already in use http://lispmonks.org http://perlmonks.org: Title, or Trash? http:// and ftp:// parser The HTTP:Daemon one can be fixed. The others already have // :(.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^8: Perl 6 links (//) by tye (Sage) on May 15, 2005 at 16:05 UTC
No, I said \w+ not (http\|https\|...). And that was intentional. I hate "reserved word" schemes. A few exceptions isn't a big deal. People can't link to those few nodes by title (unless the titles are updated, since those titles mostly aren't great anyway). Having a whole raft of nodes matching /^\w+:/ is a problem (for your proposal). - tye	[reply]