in reply to Re^5: DBM::Deep Problem
in thread DBM::Deep Problem
If you carefully extend your DBM::Deep hash, it works as advertised, and in a way that MLDBM cannot touch, and in a way that requires no binary DBM module. This is a remarkable achievement. The horsing around required by MLDBM referenced in Re^3: DBM::Deep Problem is not required in DBM::Deep.... you just have to not autovivify.
The tie bug is sad. I wish it would get fixed.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: DBM::Deep Problem
by holli (Abbot) on May 18, 2005 at 12:34 UTC | |
by merlyn (Sage) on May 18, 2005 at 12:58 UTC | |
|
Re^7: DBM::Deep Problem
by demerphq (Chancellor) on May 18, 2005 at 12:39 UTC | |
by merlyn (Sage) on May 18, 2005 at 13:05 UTC | |
by demerphq (Chancellor) on May 18, 2005 at 13:39 UTC |