Re: looking for simple way to check scalar against array

Like this?

#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $i = 4;
my @nums = ( 1 .. 9 );
push (@nums, -12);
for (@nums)
{
   print if /$i/;
}
[download]

#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $i = 4;
for ( 1 .. 9, -12 )
{
    print if /$i/;
}
[download]

UPDATE
What blazar ikegami and dug said.
My example was to show you what you might not want to do, but may or may not work anyway.

Ted
--
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier, not that the task itself has become easier, but that our ability to perform it has improved."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson

Comment on Re: looking for simple way to check scalar against array Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: looking for simple way to check scalar against array by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 19, 2005 at 15:11 UTC
Why use a regexp? It's inefficient, and that particular regexp will fail if 1) $i contains special characters, and 2) if $i is part of another number (e.g. when $i=1 and list=(2..10), your regexp will match). `print if /^\Q$i\E$/` would fix the problem. `print if $_ eq $i` is equivalent, but much more efficient. `print if $_ == $i` would be even more efficient given that we're dealing with numbers here.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^2: looking for simple way to check scalar against array by dug (Chaplain) on May 19, 2005 at 15:12 UTC
If the list contains anything with a 4 in it you will get a match, which I don't think is what the OP wants. If you are going to use the regex approach it should probably be anchored on both ends: `/^$i$/`. update: Not that you really needed a third person to remind you [grin]. -- Douglas	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: looking for simple way to check scalar against array by blazar (Canon) on May 19, 2005 at 15:09 UTC
Gawd, believe me: I'm very keen on regexen myself, but I wouldn't use one where what you really want is an equality operator! And in that case it should be `/^$i$/ if you qw/really wanted to do it like that/;` [download] Update: As duly pointed out by ikegami, to be really more precise, one should use `/^\Q$i\E$/`, which may seem nitpicking wrt this particular example, but which can be also absolutely necessary in other situations... (well, not that you would use this actual regex, but maybe a somewhat similar one.)	[reply] [d/l] [select]