Re: Why aren't you using Perl 6 yet?

It is premature to use it for work, and my home machine has died (but is somewhat useable with knoppix). I'm putting off replacing my machine until after I move in a month, and after that we'll see how much spare time I have. (Hasn't been much lately, for personal reasons.)

Comment on Re: Why aren't you using Perl 6 yet?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Why aren't you using Perl 6 yet? by gaal (Parson) on May 23, 2005 at 21:20 UTC
s{Knoppix}{http://linide.sf.net/pugs-livecd-6.2.5.iso} :-) Update: Updated to fixed version.	[reply]
Re^3: Why aren't you using Perl 6 yet? by stefp (Vicar) on May 24, 2005 at 11:10 UTC
Nice. Can you produce a stable URL that always points to the latest version? I want to mention it in a article that will be published one (or two) months from now. -- stefp	[reply]
Re^4: Why aren't you using Perl 6 yet? by iblech (Friar) on May 24, 2005 at 14:37 UTC
http://linide.sf.net/pugs-livecd-latest.iso --Ingo	[reply]
Re^3: Why aren't you using Perl 6 yet? by tilly (Archbishop) on May 25, 2005 at 02:50 UTC
The problem is that Pugs moves so fast that I'd always feel seriously out of date. I can just wait a couple of months. Particularly since I don't have that much spare time.	[reply]
Re^4: Why aren't you using Perl 6 yet? by gaal (Parson) on May 25, 2005 at 05:08 UTC
In a way you're right, of course. In the time between your post and mine, this happened.	[reply]