in reply to Implication operator

As was already pointed out, you can get implication already with:
(A and not B)
(just look at the truth-table). As for your example, it can be cleanly written with:
($method ne "post") or ($contenttype eq "application/x-www-form-urle +ncoded)
since you are never falling through the or unless the method is "post".

In fact I find the form I wrote easier to follow than the version with the implication operator that you asked for. There does come a time when offering many logically equivalent ways to say the same thing lends to confusion, and I think this crosses that line. (As does "unless" and "until" quite often.)