in reply to Re^5: Wat was the Architecture used in perlmonks
in thread Wat was the Architecture used in perlmonks

Ask yourself, if you were in charge of a military base would you publish the blueprints and engineers diagrams and specs on the bulletin-board outside? Of course you wouldn't.
I know secrecy may be good, or necessary. But we're not talking about the super-duper secret bomber plane here, merely a web-based bulletin-board :) Security IS important, sure. But it's only a website, it doesn't even runs a business after all (nobody will lose his job if PM is defaced, isn't it?)
Actually I don't really mind seeing the PM code or not. I just wanted to throw some fuel into the usual flamewar know :)
  • Comment on Re^6: Wat was the Architecture used in perlmonks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Wat was the Architecture used in perlmonks
by demerphq (Chancellor) on May 26, 2005 at 16:24 UTC

    But it's only a website, it doesn't even runs a business after all (nobody will lose his job if PM is defaced, isn't it?)

    If the system were properly compromised they could use it as a stepping stone to other sites managed by our noble hosts which would almost certainly result in them terminating their fine support of our organization. And then where would we be? No, while we are all volunteers I think most of us active participants take our roles pretty seriously and we will never knowingly do anything to allow such a thing to occur.

    ---
    $world=~s/war/peace/g