Hi,
Oh, tlm, I did not try your method, but (time permitting), I will give it a shot. I tried the following 8 cases.
File t.txt:
cat
in
the
hat
Case 1 (write,no + sign, use seek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,">t.txt);
seek (TEST,0,0);
print TEST "The\n";
close (TEST);
Case 2 (write, + sign, use seek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,"+>t.txt);
seek (TEST,0,0);
print TEST "The\n";
close (TEST);
Case 3 (append, no plus sign, use seek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,">>t.txt);
seek (TEST,0,0);
print TEST "The\n";
close (TEST);
Case 4 (append, use + sign, use seek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,"+>>t.txt);
seek (TEST,0,0);
print TEST "The\n";
close (TEST);
Case 5 (write, no plus sign, use sysseek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,">t.txt);
sysseek (TEST,0,0);
syswrite TEST, "The\n";
close (TEST);
Case 6 (write, use + sign, use sysseek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,"+>t.txt);
sysseek (TEST,0,0);
syswrite TEST, "The\n";
close (TEST);
<Case 7 (append, no + sign, use sysseek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,">>t.txt);
sysseek (TEST,0,0);
syswrite TEST, "The\n";
close (TEST);
Case 8 (append, use + sign, use sysseek):
#!/usr/bin perl -w
open (TEST,"+>>t.txt);
sysseek (TEST,0,0);
syswrite TEST, "The\n";
close (TEST);
Results:
Cases 1,2,5,6
t.txt
The
Cases 3,4,7,8:
t.txt
cat
in
the
hat
The
Conclusion:
The results are driven by one thing; whether opening the file to write (>) or to append (>>). Using + doesn't do anything and using sysseek gives the same result as seek. Whether going to the beginning of the file with seek or with sysseek (and using append), writing was performed AT THE END OF THE FILE.
I'm kind of surprised. The responses I got had the expectation that writing would be done at the top of the file. I have never seen this to be the case.
One quick question. Does opening to write (one > sign) ALWAYS cause the file to be emptied? This is what I have seen. I have never seen it have previous text.
A reminder. This was for an on-line class, which requested this procedure. I find the class documentation to have had three mistakes (for which I am disappointed).
1. It assumed that opening with write (not append) might leave previous text.
2. It assumed you could write out at the top of a file (that has text in it from previously) using syseek at 0,0.
3. It also used flock on explicit file name and not filehandle.
Thanks, monks, for your assistance.
o2 | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
fletch,
I finally tried out +<. That worked. I mean, I wouldn't have done it that way, but it worked with what the class asked for, for a procedure (using seek (filehandle,0,0) and truncate (filehandle, tell(filehandle)).
This was a good learning experience, albeit a very narrow one.
Thanks,
o2
| [reply] |