TedPride has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
Or in other words, how much will having a TEXT field in a table reduce efficiency, assuming I OPTIMIZE TABLE reasonably often? Does the reduction in efficiency only have to do with gaps caused by TEXT contents getting larger and having to move, or is there a reduction in efficiency inherent to TEXT fields with large contents? Are accesses significantly faster if the table is more compact?
Also, to a lesser extent, what's the tradeoff for having indexes? What's the ratio of views to updates that makes an index break even in terms of efficiency? Assume 10,000 records or so.
Unconsidered delete by holli - enough keep votes (5/1/3)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: OT: MySQL - TEXT field efficiency? Do I include in table or separate?
by jhourcle (Prior) on May 29, 2005 at 23:41 UTC | |
|
Re: OT: MySQL - TEXT field efficiency? Do I include in table or separate?
by trammell (Priest) on May 30, 2005 at 01:34 UTC | |
|
Re: OT: MySQL - TEXT field efficiency? Do I include in table or separate?
by Cap'n Steve (Friar) on May 30, 2005 at 05:42 UTC | |
|
Re: OT: MySQL - TEXT field efficiency? Do I include in table or separate?
by TedPride (Priest) on May 29, 2005 at 23:54 UTC | |
by jhourcle (Prior) on May 30, 2005 at 12:50 UTC |