Re^2: System usage monitor

It did on Win2K and WinXP Pro computers... In fact, I deleted those two lines from the code when posting as I've seen somewhere that they shouldn't be in production code...

--------------------------------
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it...

Comment on Re^2: System usage monitor

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: System usage monitor by ghenry (Vicar) on May 31, 2005 at 13:49 UTC
You should definitely have strict in production code, but I think warnings can be dropped after development. Anyone care to back me up? Walking the road to enlightenment... I found a penguin and a camel on the way..... Fancy a yourname@perl.me.uk? Just ask!!!	[reply]
Re^4: System usage monitor by gellyfish (Monsignor) on May 31, 2005 at 14:11 UTC
To be honest if I was going to drop one of them from production code it would be `strict` - the circumstances that `strict` prevents from arising are unlikely to occur if the code is unchanged, whereas `warnings` may reveal unexpected problems with external data, as an example. /J\	[reply] [d/l] [select]