Re^2: Solved? (aka "More On Thankfulness")

Corion, please reread the original post. I said,

It will necessarily not affect anonymonks' postings.

which means that I already recognise that anonymous monks can't mark this. That whole paragraph pointed out the limitations. Then, later, I pointed out that if we were willing to accept that there are limitations, and that it's not perfect, it may still be acceptable.

Do I take this response to mean that you're against this type of convention just because not everyone can or will use it?

Comment on Re^2: Solved? (aka "More On Thankfulness")

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Solved? (aka "More On Thankfulness") by Corion (Patriarch) on Jun 28, 2005 at 13:51 UTC
I don't see much point in the convention, but I didn't see much point in prefixing node titles with ones nickname either, even back when Newest Nodes did not display the name of the posting monk. I think my main point is, that since Anonymous Monk initiates a lot of threads, there won't be much effect of the convention. But then again, I read most of Perlmonks and I'm not necessarily on the hunt for "unsolved problems".	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Solved? (aka "More On Thankfulness")
by Corion (Patriarch) on Jun 28, 2005 at 13:51 UTC

I don't see much point in the convention, but I didn't see much point in prefixing node titles with ones nickname either, even back when Newest Nodes did not display the name of the posting monk. I think my main point is, that since Anonymous Monk initiates a lot of threads, there won't be much effect of the convention. But then again, I read most of Perlmonks and I'm not necessarily on the hunt for "unsolved problems".

[reply]