in reply to MonkReaper?!

paco, as the "canonical monk", is very useful for documentation purposes. Not to be confused with the null monk, he is sort of like the monk equivalent of http://www.example.com. If he didn't already exist, I think we'd want to invent him.

Of course, if the much cherished prospect of paco's Second Coming ever became reality, he would cease to be the canonical monk, which may necessitate rewriting any docs that used him as such, but I think the general joy over his return would easily compensate for this small inconvenience.

the lowliest monk

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: MonkReaper?!
by jdporter (Paladin) on Jan 13, 2006 at 20:04 UTC

    Oh, that's easily dealt with. PerlMonks now "owns" the paco name, for all the reasons you just mentioned; so we just lock the account (change the password) and throw away the key. Problem solved!

    ;-)
    We're building the house of the future together.