Re: Web Applications

edited for clarification
First off, I prefer an Apache running mod_perl on a Linux box.

I personnally like the combination of these modules: HTML::Template, CGI::Application, Class::DBI, and Apache

Comment on Re: Web Applications

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Web Applications by Arunbear (Prior) on Jul 06, 2005 at 17:30 UTC
First off, you definitely need an Apache running mod_perl on a Linux box. Why? Why not *BSD? Why not fastcgi or just vanilla CGI (the OP did say "not so large websites")?	[reply]
Re^3: Web Applications by shiza (Hermit) on Jul 06, 2005 at 17:56 UTC
"What framework do you feel content about not so large websites? What is your toolset?" He asked what you feel content about and what your toolset was. I replied with my preferences. If you prefer different options, post them. This isn't a competition. :\ Besides, what I posted works well with large and small applications and provides room for growth.	[reply]
Re^4: Web Applications by Arunbear (Prior) on Jul 06, 2005 at 21:40 UTC
I have no problem with your choice of tools. Before you edited your reply, your original words were "First off, you definitely need ..." which suggests that the chosen tools are the 'best' choice (and which is what I don't agree with), and is quite different in meaning from "First off, I prefer ...".	[reply]