in reply to HTML::TreeBuilder dropping end tags
I think they're currently specified by W3C to require them, since I'd expect things would trend toward strict SGML/XML compliance. However, any browser worth anything will have to put up with this historical usage. Be flexible in what you accept, and strict in what you produce, as the saying goes.
(Oh, and lose the extra "o" in loose. If your belt is loose, you might lose your pants.)
--
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: HTML::TreeBuilder dropping end tags
by Joost (Canon) on Jul 13, 2005 at 18:33 UTC | |
|
Re^2: HTML::TreeBuilder dropping end tags
by admiral_grinder (Pilgrim) on Jul 13, 2005 at 19:45 UTC |