in reply to Re^3: Negative Lookahead Assertion Problem
in thread Negative Lookahead Assertion Problem
As to "missing )", I meant (but put it poorly) in your statement:
Surely trying to match \s* is futile in a negative-lookup? Because \s* can match nothing it will always succeed, thereby never matching??The assertion wasn't \s*, it was \s*\(, a horse of a completely different color.
|
---|