As noted above, we can't really help you unless you specify what kind of page you're talking about. (HTML, PDF, scanned / OCR processed, from any specific site/publication or in general etc). It would also help if you could explain what parts of the problem you need help with - if you have any code, but you're stuck, posting that code could help.
Please also note that the chances of people helping you will increase significantly if you can be bothered to read the replies here instead of asking people to contact you in private. Most regular monks regard the site as a public information forum, and replying in private won't help others who might have a similar question.
Please read how (not) to ask a question, it will probably help you get worthwhile answers, and save everybody some time in the future.
| [reply] |
You will need to look at HTML::Parser to start with, but as you haven't given any indication of what you have tried or the nature of the 'page' you are trying to parse it's difficult to be more specific.
/J\
| [reply] |
| [reply] |
It's an HTML page. Sorry I'm new to the site. I am not a programmer so maybe I can offer a few dollars to anyone interested? | [reply] |
Most of the people here will fall all over themselves in an attempt to help you, but not because you offer to pay them. What really incites cooperation on PerlMonks is a detailed problem description complete with sample input; expected output; and examples of code you have already tried - why those failed, or how you wish they could be made to perform better.
In your case:
1. What is the specific page you want to parse? Can you at least provide a mock-up with fake data?
2. When you say you want "article title", are you looking for what's between two HTML tags? Is there some other way of designating what constitutes a "blurb"?
3. What DB are you using? What format do you want the output to be in?
4. What have you tried so far? Which packages/modules are you looking at? If you can't show actual code, can you provide pseudo-code? (PerlMonks are "pathologically helpful," but they do like to see that you've made an effort to at least begin solving your problem by yourself.)
5. If you have a good start, but it doesn't do quite what you'd like, can you tell us how you'd like to see it improved?
HTH,
| [reply] |