ActiveX is IE/Win32 only, but recent versions of most JavaScript capable browsers implement XMLHttpRequest using other techniques these days. Jim Ley has a good introduction.
It doesn't really give you a great deal in the way of benefits over just using a hidden iframe though. (And I wouldn't suggest either technique without a decent non-JS fallback solution.
| [reply] |
I will still follow up with the javajunkies.org group
Javascript is not java, so don't bother javajunkies with javascript either
| [reply] |
Yes, XMLHttpRequest is Windows-only. It might even be IE-only too.
and then serves back one complete web page with the frames and forms all set with all the required fields.
You're a bit loose on the details -- for example, the script cannot serve both the frame and the framed pages in the same request -- but your idea is doable.
| [reply] |
XMLHttpRequest in some flavour is supported by Firefox, Safari, and (not as sure on this one) Opera and is the basis for the new "AJAX" style of web applications.
See http://script.aculo.us/downloads for a premade JS library, and there's also HTML::Prototype for accessing the JS Prototype library.
--
We're looking for people in ATL
| [reply] |
Please excuse my ignorance. I realize now that my original question was off subject for this forum, however I appreciate the help and re-direction from all who replied. From further search, the XMLHttpRequest object is supported by Netscape/Mozilla, as well as IE with ActiveX, and is the basis of AJAX (Async JS with Xml), which seems to have been developed to meet just my type of requirment. I Still have to research the JS world to see if my original approach will work, but the AJAX may be a sounder way. If they don't pan out, the Perl CGI should do the trick.
Thanks, Irv
| [reply] |