yes, I've had a look on it already, but thanks.
it also doesn't support all HTML::Template options, and it's about 4-8 times faster, while HTC was about 5 times faster in my tests. not too much faster in comparison.
and it has the limitations of HTML::Template I mentioned before and in my manpage. | [reply] |
I'd like to see your tests. It's hard to see how your perl one could be faster, unless it is leaving out significant pieces of functionality.
| [reply] |
ok, the test script is right there in the package (t/test.pl, t/test.html). I updated some minutes ago it because the version that was in the package wasn't runnable.
ok, it's not a complete test of all functionalities, but you can have a look at it and maybe tell me what I'm missing.
update: i updated the test.pl script again, so now everybody should see quickly what it is doing. before it was just a big mess...
update2: here is the test script with additional testing of H::T::JIT: http://www.tinita.de/projects/perl/modules/HTC_test_pl.txt
when I run it HTC is more than 3 times faster than H::T::JIT, so I *must* be doing something wrong...
| [reply]
[d/l] |